DNR To Host Public Hearings On Enbridge Pipeline Expansion In Superior

Enbridge Energy Wants To Expanded Oil Pipeline From North Dakota To Superior

Enbridge Energy building
Mack Male (CC-BY-SA)

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is planning to hold a pair of public hearings on Enbridge Energy’s plans to build a crude oil pipeline from North Dakota to Superior.

The Canadian firm’s planned Sandpiper line would carry up to 600,000 barrels of oil per day from the Bakken oil fields of North Dakota to its terminal in Superior. The company also plans to replace segments of its aging Line 3 pipeline, originally built in the late 1960s. The projects are expected to cost more than $2.6 billion on the U.S. side.

The DNR is soliciting public feedback on a draft environmental study on the expansions. Ben Callan, water management specialist for the agency, said Enbridge wants to build along 14 miles of its existing right-of-way in Douglas County.

Stay informed on the latest news

Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“The portion that affects Wisconsin, although small, is significant from the perspective of, there’s a lot of resources we need to ensure are adequately protected and that the law is followed regarding our decision-making process,” said Callan.

Construction of the Sandpiper and Line 3 could impact scores of wetlands, Callan said. The DNR’s draft study also details minor to severe impacts for four federally endangered or threatened species, including the gray wolf, northern long-eared bat and a large sandpiper bird called the rufa red knot. Enbridge has said it will take steps to reduce impacts to wetlands and wildlife.

The expansions are anticipated to create 400 to 500 jobs in Wisconsin during construction. Despite a current dip in crude oil prices, Enbridge spokeswoman Lorraine Little said their customers are still demanding a cheaper way to move oil than by rail.

“One of the real important aspects of Sandpiper is that there’s still about 1 million barrels of oil per day being produced out of the Bakken,” said Little. “Shippers would definitely like to see a lower cost transportation option available to them.”

Completion of the two projects, however, will likely be delayed until 2019. Enbridge hoped to finish construction on the two lines by 2017, but Little said regulatory delays in Minnesota have slowed their plans.

“We’ll continue working with our regulators in each state in order to complete the permitting process that we need in order to build the project,” said Little.

Enbridge is asking the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to reconsider an order that a full environmental impact statement be completed before Sandpiper and Line 3 move forward with Minnesota’s permitting process.

According to the Wisconsin DNR’s Callan, the delays in Minnesota means the agency is only accepting input on Enbridge’s application for a waterway and wetlands permit for Line 3. He said the company’s permit application for Sandpiper has been deemed incomplete at this time.

Regardless of the timeline, critics of the expansions like Carl Whiting with the Wisconsin Safe Energy Alliance are expressing fears that the projects set the stage for Enbridge to build a second pipeline next to its Line 61 that runs through a large swath of the state from Superior to the Illinois border.

“Our concern is that Enbridge has stated publicly that they’re in early development work of a line very similar to Line 61,” said Whiting. “You may come to a different sense of the level of risk than when you look at all of the river crossings and pipes that will be necessary to get this oil to market.”

Enbridge has said no final decision has been made on building a second line parallel to Line 61 across the state.

The public hearings on the draft studies for the Sandpiper and Line 3 expansion will be held Thursday afternoon at 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. at the Superior Public Library.