, ,

Tavern League Files Lawsuit To End Limits On Bar, Restaurant Capacity During Pandemic

Lawsuit Argues COVID-19 Restrictions Should Go Through Legislative Process

By
Two people sit at a table while wearing masks as those around them do not
Brienna Wagner, center, wears a mask while sitting at an outdoor table with Andy Wagner on Thursday, July 30, 2020, in Waukesha. Angela Major/WPR

The Tavern League of Wisconsin has filed a lawsuit to strike down the Evers administration’s emergency order limiting bar and restaurant capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The order, which went into effect last Thursday, requires bars and restaurants across the state to limit capacity to 25 percent until Nov. 6.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Sawyer County, argues that the court should throw out the order because it wasn’t created through the emergency rulemaking process, a process that requires state lawmakers to approve any restrictions on people and businesses during the pandemic. Using the process would essentially give the GOP-controlled Legislature veto power over any restrictions.

Stay informed on the latest news

Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Chris Marsicano, president of the Tavern League of Wisconsin, said Wisconsin restaurants and bars are facing “economic ruin” as the pandemic continues, and that businesses shutdowns “have not proven effective” as the virus has spread in the state.

“The Tavern League of Wisconsin is committed to fighting the spread of COVID-19, but will not stand by and watch its members be forced out of business by unlawful orders,” Marsicano said in a prepared statement. “We need the help and support of our communities and elected officials to keep defeat COVID-19 while keeping our ‘OPEN’ signs lit.”

He said the state needs to “kill COVID, not small business.”

On Monday, GOP lawmakers on the Legislature’s rulemaking committee voted to direct the Evers administration to submit its latest emergency order to be approved through the rulemaking process. Supporters of the vote said the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s May ruling striking down the Evers administration’s stay-at-home order decreed all future restrictions on people and businesses during the pandemic should go through the rulemaking process.

The governor’s office disagrees. On a Tuesday call with reporters, the governor said his administration will not submit the latest order to the rulemaking process.

Our order is consistent with the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this year, and we continue to ask everyone to do their part to prevent the spread of this virus by staying home, limiting travel and gatherings, and wearing face coverings whenever in public,” said Britt Cudaback, the governor’s spokesperson, in response to the lawsuit.

The order is different from other recent decrees from the Evers administration during the pandemic because it didn’t come from the governor, but instead from state Department of Health Services (DHS) Secretary Andrea Palm, who issued the stay-at-home order that was struck down in May.

The latest order attempts to use powers the Supreme Court didn’t address in its May ruling that give the DHS secretary the ability to “forbid public gatherings in schools, churches, and other places to control outbreaks and epidemics.”

The governor’s most recent order, which extended the statewide mask mandate, is also being challenged in court.

The lawsuit comes as Wisconsin continues to set records for new daily confirmed cases of COVID-19, as well as deaths and hospitalizations. The state reported 3,279 new cases of the disease Tuesday, the highest that figure has ever been. There were also 34 new deaths from COVID-19 reported, another record high.

Hats off to members like you! WPR Bucket Hat $20/month. Give Now.